Bitcoin (BTC) Is Not Anonymous, and Why Satoshi Cannot ...
Buying and Using Bitcoin Anonymously Without ID (2020 Updated)
Can you Really Buy Bitcoin Anonymously? Try our Step by ...
Tulip Trust Addresses are Used by Someone to Sign "Craig ...
Best USD / Bitcoin Exchanges
Guide to using Bitcoin anonymously – BeInCrypto
Best Bitcoin Brokers – List of Top BTC Trading Sites 2020
Investing in Binance (BNB) - Everything You Need to Know ...
How to Keep Your Identity Safe While Using Bitcoin
How does one use a privacy coin to get privacy? thanks
OK, I understand Bitcoin is only pseudo anonymous. Privacy coins like Monero and Dash i understand only as an investment. But how do they really work? People on this sub say to use a coinmixer, others say only XRP has the anonymity set to really help. If I have 100 Euro and I want private bitcoin, what's my best bet? If I just buy Monero and use that money to buy Bitcoin is that good, is that all we need to be private? or is a peer to peer exchange really better, but then might we get tainted bitcoins there, better to use private coins and buy from Binance ? I am lost, please help. Just pointing me to a readthis is ok
Several major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Paxful and Binance, have recently demonstrated their negative attitude to mixing services. 🤹♀️ A cryptocurrency mixing service (cryptocurrency tumbler, Bitcoin mixer) is a special tool intended to mix ‘tainted’ or pseudo-anonymous coins with others. It makes tracing their origin very hard. It should be noted that a BTC mixer is not always used for money-laundering and other criminal purposes. Some law-abiding people apply it just for the love of privacy. 🕵️♀️ Obviously, crypto exchanges seek to decrease the level of privacy in order to increase transparency and security. In such a way, they want to ensure better compliance with KYC/AML regulations and avoid getting involved with ‘dirty money’. As for exchange users, many of them don’t agree with this strategy and see it as an attempt to pry into their business. The latest event of this kind involved Paxful exchange - they blocked the account of the user Ronald McHodled when he tried to withdraw his funds. The exchange support service was worried that Ronald had tried to withdraw the money to a well-known mixing service and demanded explanations. 🤷♂️ McHodled himself declares he did not use this mixing service for any bad purpose. According to him, it was like using an ATM for withdrawing cash. And what do you think? https://preview.redd.it/x0ecrbka19g41.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=44b4e2f70e6df26cfcbf92b833e5ac53757a052a
How and why on earth did cryptocurrency become what is is today and should we seriously do something aboout it?
My first thought is - rather fittingly - the genesis block of BTC. Specifically the message: The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks Today, over 10 years later, this kind of message might as well read: Coindesk(dot)com xx/xx/2019 Crypto whales and miners on the brink of a second bailout for cryptocurrency exchanges Bitfinex being perhaps the most iconic example. Losing 850 million USD just like that thanks to transnational government agencies, they faced a similar fate as banks in the housing crisis. Total wipe-out. Just like banks, these monolithic exchanges are too big to fail. Failure would mean a global financial crisis in crypto, much like mt.gox. Not that different from the banks that got bailed out by institutions, Bitfinex received the same treatment, except from whales, investment funds, rich corporate entities and such. They covered for the whole loss basically, allowing things to keep operational at least. There wasn't really any demand for another tether, so without it, it could have been an economic meltdown in crypto. Hearing about similar offers made by other rich entities operating in the crypto scene to Binance after their hack, I'm starting to think this has become an even bigger, more common thing with crypto exchanges than it has been with banks. It's rich people in positions of power protecting their own interests, except that in the proper spirit of crypto, it's quite secretive, likely (pseudo)anonymous and way less transparent than what the central banks did. Due to the nature of this technology, it can be hard to grasp what the actions taken by Bitfinex mean. To my understanding, they minted a new coin, LEO (witty name for a token under these circumstances..) and basically just decided it's market cap is 1 billion, then in a private sale, managed to somehow pull off the biggest ever ICO in the history of crypto, 1 billion of funding in just 10 days for what appears to me as basically printing money in order to cover for accounting, as this exclusive club taking part in the sale of LEO committed into buying said tokens using the money Bitfinex previously printed in order to manipulate the markets and profit, USDT that is. Can't remember any ICO in the past where the minimum barrier for an individual to participate was 1 million dollars and for companies, groups, or funds 100+ million. We traded the tyranny of the banking system for a system that eventually reached centralization of power to a much greater degree, accompanied with lack of regulation and oversight which we all welcomed. I have observed and participated in the scene for at least 9 years, so almost from the very beginning, seeing the rise of first altcoins for example and all the crazy phenomena which emerged and how the community dealt with them, evolving in the process. There has been a distinct pattern that can be traced back to these early days, where some group of people would figure out how to use this new technology in all kinds of creative ways which under normal circumstances would have been considered fraud, collusion... all kind of things we did NOT want. So when the majority aka victims became aware, we always protested accordingly. Pre-mined cloned coins that were hyped over social media only so the creators would profit? We decided they were worthless. So these people, having a very lucrative way of essentially scamming people dreaming of moons came up with a solution: there will be no pre-mine, but coins were launched under the radar and only people with power (many BTC) were informed. In case you aren't familiar, when a new minable coin is released and there's only a handful of miners, a significant portion of the tokens in circulation are mined in an insanely fast manner, first 10% of total supply generated in a matter of hours perhaps, giving everyone who managed to mine on the day of launch a major advantage. We decided the secrecy was equally bad and they openly announced these coins, directing masses to use mining pools, only for them to be be under DDOS during the launch. That pattern eventually evolved to ICO's and everything else we see today. Ripping people off in sophisticated enough ways that we put up with it. After all, we could always get lucky from the 'generous' pump & dump groups they were organizing and offering to us. The system may have changed, but the philosophy is the same: people with the most money either as individuals or a group exploiting 'lesser' people and groups, concentrating power (BTC) in the process much akin to 'rich get richer while poor get poorer'. 10 years onwards, thanks to the financial side (trading), the whole crypto economy is still not only using but dependent on market manipulation and all kinds of deceiving schemes. This has been a major obstacle to wide-scale adoption, despite powerful people trying to convince us that manipulating prices to the level of a bubble will lead to people thinking this technology is great and start using it. In reality, many among the general population either had or started having doubts about these bitcoins. Imagine if they tried to sell internet and all of it's possibilities solely through nigerian prince scam spam. Then there's the miners, one of if not the most powerful entity in cryptoscene as a whole. Naturally their power and influence only grew, significant investments were made. I remember conversations with some chinese guy mining LTC back in 2014, he was always like "Yay, the newest shipment of 300 AMD GPU's came straight out the factory". Must have had thousands. Asics had begun dominating BTC mining and they weren't cheap either. Not to mention all that electricity too. Where I'm leading you with this, is the current situation where we have established mining companies with ASICs dedicated solely to BTC mining for efficiency, probably pretty much useless for anything else. Valuations of 100's of millions if not billions at their peak. Then we realized how stupid it is to waste electricity like that when we could do it in a better way, Proof-of-Stake. Instant conflict of interest hindering further innovation due to competition instead of the opposite. The mining giants refuse to go out quietly and many have been mining BTC at a loss (electricity) for a long time now, effectively needing a pump to dump those mined BTC just to cover their operating costs in the past as they naturally didn't want to sell them at a loss. Side-note: I think the current pump is due to a lot of BTC miners quitting and cashing out of BTC in a way that doesn't bankrupt them. To make matters force, they can effectively coerce both whales and crypto exchanges to co-operate in order to pump the prices because if the miners go out of business, everyone utilizing BTC for profit is in big trouble. So if they say they need a pump to dump, they get one. Bail-outs for miners too for christ sake. Luckily, we have alternatives being heavily developed, but I fear for a financial meltdown for crypto before they reach a mature stage. Not a very popular subject to my knowledge, because in the near future, somebody has to pay the bill and this time it ain't covered by taxes collected. This awesome technology has been primarily abused and exploited, with people innovating in the are of 'get-rich-quick' schemes more than the technology itself. Ethereum was supposed to be a paradigm shift, but it became another instrument of the same scheme, even though it helped push tech forward some. Remember that this is a time of decentralization. It's up to us, the collective, to do something about this if we want (or even can for that matter). Ironically, we stuck with the old mindset of 'just wait it out and The Man will fix it for us eventually' which was supposedly a thing of the past. So I ask you: What are your opinions about the current state of affairs in crypto, especially the financial side? Do you feel it's all good and if so, why? Any and all input is welcome. Let's make the scene a better place and show good example to the pagans who doubt us due to our dubious practices in the past and even today, furthering acceptance and adoption instead of laser-point focus on profit to the point the system collapses.
Bitcoin transactions are said to be pseudo-anonymous because even though the transactions themselves are transparent, they’re only linked to the public addresses of wallets, and the wallets are not linked to personal IDs by default. However, an agent with sufficient knowledge and determination can reveal, with relative ease, the average wallet owner’s identity and therefore trace back to ... That’s why Bitcoin is often called pseudonymous or pseudo-anonymous. However, a person’s identity can be associated with a Bitcoin address through other means. For example when people publish their name together with their Bitcoin address online (among other ways). Once the association has been made, someone with enough determination, time, and resources could analyze the blockchain and ... In the past, bitcoin has been perceived as a currency used by criminals on the dark web mainly due to the pseudo-anonymity feature. However in the recent years, as bitcoin gained bigger and bigger popularity, this negative tag has been disassociated from bitcoin. The governments no longer see bitcoin as a vehicle for money laundering. The FED stated in 2014 that Bitcoin It would be impossible to discuss trading cryptocurrencies without taking a moment to look at the popular exchange Binance. Binance has been the largest cryptocurrency exchange in terms of market capitalization since 2018. According to the company’s CEO, Changpeng Zhao, a combination of factors including experience, skill, and “luck” helped the platform achieve its legendary […] As Bitcoin is a pseudo-anonymous digital currency by nature, it is common that users prefer to keep their profile low and do not want to share any personal details on the Internet. Pseudo-anonymous means that Bitcoin addresses cannot be referred to individuals as long as their name has never been linked to the address. Bitcoin’s rapid growth has indeed been something of great wonder. In recent times, the coin has gained increased usability, evidenced by increased transactions-nearly 320, 199 transactions per day with an increased number of online merchants who offer the ability to pay using Bitcoin.. While Bitcoin’s transactions have often been described as anonymous, the coin isn’t entirely anonymous. Some people say Bitcoin (BTC) is pseudo-anonymous, but the harsh reality is Bitcoin (BTC) may not be anonymous at all anymore. As of April 2018 , blockchain forensics firms had raised tens of millions of dollars, with $1.5 million of purchase orders from government agencies like the IRS, DEA, FBI, SEC, CFTC, and ICE. Bitcoin is pseudo-anonymous; transactions can be traced and centralized exchanges hold know-your-customer (KYC) information. For security reasons, some users prefer to maintain anonymity, for example to protect against exchange hacks that expose KYC information. Options for buying and using Bitcoin anonymously include peer-to-peer exchanges, Bitcoin ATMs and dark web tumbler services. Bitcoin ... The Bitcoin network itself can be described as pseudo-anonymous. It provides much more anonymity than a bank, but is not fully untraceable in its native state. Unlike other digital accounts that are linked to an email address, personal identity, or physical address, Bitcoin addresses are alphanumeric strings recorded on the public ledger. Some of the addresses that Craig Wright, who claims himself to be the pseudo-anonymous bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, has filed in the ongoing court case has been used by someone other than him. This individual used the private key to sign a message where they call Wright a “fraud.” “Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud.
Coinbase vs Kraken vs Binance cryptocurrency exchanges
Users can buy and sell multiple cryptocurrencies using Chinese yuan, Vietnamese Dong and Russian Rubles with 0 fees on #BinanceP2P. Trade now at: p2p.binance.com. Learn about the different major crypto exchanges out there. I will be hosting a webinar this Monday on Oct 28 at 12 PM EDT. Here are the details: Bryan Downing is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom ... ⚠️DON'T Let Your Bitcoin Be STOLEN FROM YOU 😫! Save Your Future ♕Wealth♕ From ☠️DYING!😵⚰️ Save 72.00% Discount 2 Years! Save Your Future ♕Wealth♕ From ☠️DYING ... Tags: Bitcoin ethereum bittrex binance bitcoin news poloniex bitcoin mining dogecoin gbtc bitfinex eth price monero myetherwallet antminer s9 siacoin paxful changelly zcash cryptocompare reddcoin ... Podemos comprar várias moedas na binance exchange, e ter lucros diários na plataforma. Estude bem o mercado antes de fazer seus investimentos, pois tudo tem seus riscos. Binance link: https://www.binance.com/?ref=15371208 ★Check out our website for the latest market reports!★ Website: https://www.27thstreetcapital.com ... how to buy bitcoins anonymously how to buy bitcoin reddit buy bitcoin at walmart best place to buy bitcoins simi lolu bitconnect what is bitconnect how to buy bitconnect bitcoin for dummies ...